Minnesota EngagementMinnesota Legislators Voting on Crucial Patient Privacy and Consent Bill Thursday
ST. PAUL, Minn.—Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom (CCHF) is alerting Minnesota residents about a crucial legislative vote Thursday that will impact medical privacy and patient consent rights. URGENT PRIVACY ALERT Call MN Representatives ASAP
MN Legislature to Vote TOMORROW on Big Business Amendment that Permits Virtually Unfettered Access to Your Private Medical Records / Genetic Data WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT MN Legislature is on One-Week Break - Here's What's Happened So Far
We've been busy this session. It's tough keeping track of what legislators are doing that could or will impact your health care freedom! There are lots of bills, unexpected amendments, and procedural surprises. 10 Harms of Stripping Patient Consent
ST. PAUL, Minn.—Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom (CCHF, www.cchfreedom.org) is alerting Minnesota residents—and the nation—about two bills that would void patient consent requirements found in the Minnesota Health Records Act (MHRA) by imposing the federal HIPAA “no consent” rule. Testimony on SF 730
(Opioid Stewardship Program / PMP Funding and Fees / Prescription Limits / Law Enforcement / PMP Required Use / Opioid Limits)
Testimony on HF 1440 (Opioid Stewardship Program)
Submitted Testimony on HF 1440 (Opioid Stewardship Program) MN House HHS Reform Committee
TEN “HIPAA” HARMS
Why Minnesota Legislature Should NOT Adopt Federal HIPAA “No-Consent” Rule for Patient Medical Information
Minnesota Legislators Introduce Bills to Bypass Consent Requirements and End Patient Privacy
As Minnesota employs some of the country’s toughest patient privacy laws, this exception downgrades Minnesota’s consent requirements to the level of the federal HIPAA “No Privacy” rule, says CCHF. The bills, if passed, would circumvent Minnesota’s strongest-in-the-nation privacy law and render it useless. Bills Introduced to Bypass MN Privacy and Consent Laws
On Monday, March 6th, Representative Nick Zerwas (R - Elk River) introduced HF 3312 and Senator Eric Pratt (R - Prior Lake) indtroduced SF 2975. These identical companion bills provide an exception to the patient consent requirements found in the Minnesota Health Records Act (MHRA). This exception downgrades Minnesota's consent requirements to the level of the federal "No Privacy" HIPAA rule. The bills, if passed, would circumvent Minnesota's strongest-in-the-nation privacy law and render it useless. Donate Today!
Your generosity is appreciated!
*CCHF has received 501(c)3 Model State Legislation LibraryFind Patient and Privacy-Protecting Legislation — Share it with your State Legislature.
GET INVOLVEDFollow Us on Social Media
_____________________________ Click below to let CCHF know!
Award-Winning Book
Health Privacy Alert!
HIPAA DOES NOT PROTECT PRIVACY... AND YOU ARE By federal law, you are not required to sign the clinic or hospital HIPAA "Privacy" form (or the Acknowledgement of the Notice of Privacy Practices embedded in consent forms)...even if the clinic tries to insist that you must.
ACA - "Obamacare"
Medical or Health Care Sharing
Patient Privacy
Baby DNA Warehousing
Health Insurance Exchange
REAL ID - Federal Control
 Play/Pause
|
.jpg)
.png)
