Employer and Exchange Data-Sharing Requirements

Health Exchanges -Obamacare
"The ACA cannot be implemented without an insurance exchange in each state. It's a go or it's a no-go. It's that simple." - As Robert Laszewski, president of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, Sept 2012, HealthDay.
ACA I, II, III - Why the Affordable Care Act Should Be Repealed
"Refuse to Enroll" plus Billboard and Bus Shelter Posters
** Although exchange supporters encourage insured individuals and families to try to find lower-cost taxpayer-subsidized coverage on the government exchange, there is no reason to change coverage if an individual or family currently has private health insurance that meets federal requirements.
9 Exemptions and 14 Hardship Waivers - Obamacare Mandate
Hardship Exemption Information:
Qualifications for Exemption from ACA Mandate Application for Hardship Exemption to ACA Mandate
Health Insurance Exchanges - Top Ten Terribles 15 REASONS: Oppose Obamaʼs Health Insurance Exchanges Private Health Insurance Exchanges MN EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS - contracts, letters, rejection letter FEDERAL EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS (limited list) - letters from Congress and Federal Departments
Employer and Exchange Data-Sharing Requirements![]()
This 3-page document provides the specific parts of the ACA that require national registration of individual and employer compliance with the health reform law's mandate to purchase health insurance. These sections of law specifically require reporting of name, social security numbers, employer ID numbers and other information required by the Secretary.
State Exchanges: A Ruse for National Registration of Insurance Status![]() ST. PAUL, M.N. – As states begin to process and plan for the implementation of “American Health Benefit Exchanges,” otherwise known as state health exchanges, the reality of the end of personal health privacy is being realized by individual citizens. The Citizens' Council for Health Freedom has produced a detailed diagram that shows exactly how each individual state exchange is connected back to the federal government, creating a federal registration system that involves every American. CCHF Commends States that Refuse Health Exchanges![]() “These state exchanges are really the crux of the Affordable Care Act,” said Brase. “It is mandated that each one be connected to the larger, nationwide exchange and enable sharing of information on a national level with multiple government agencies and entities that have no place in what goes on between a person and his or her doctor. By refusing to implement an exchange, states protect the doctor patient relationship and keep care where it belongs, while preventing an extremely costly and ineffective system from moving forward.” Exchanges: Compromise Privacy, Provide Federal Agencies Control![]() ST. PAUL, Minn. – Now that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) mainly constitutional, primary components such as health insurance exchanges are being pushed at the state level. But implementation of these exchanges creates new and lasting challenges, adding $340 billion to the nation’s deficit and creating $17 trillion in long-term, unfunded liabilities that will burden the already floundering economy. Perhaps even more disturbing is the intrusion into patient privacy that these exchanges allow. An Open Letter to all Minnesotans from State Health Care Leaders![]() Dayton Administration Pushes Exchange; No State Statute Allows it DeMint, Bachmann, Jordan Urge Governors to Reject Obamacare State Exchanges![]()
(Washington, D.C.) Senator Jim DeMint (SC), Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (MN-06) and Congressman Jim Jordan (OH-04) sent a letter to all 50 governors urging them to oppose the implementation of the state health care exchanges mandated under President Obama’s health care law. Twelve Senators and 61 Representatives joined them in writing in opposition to these exchanges, which could cost businesses up to $3,000 per employee.
CCHF Implores States to Resist Healthcare Exchanges![]() ST. PAUL, Minn. – The Supreme Court of the United States today took the weakest option available with regard to the ACA: ruling the individual mandate constitutional while providing a loophole for states to opt out of the Medicaid expansion if they so choose. According to the Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom (CCHF), states can and should resist implementation of the government health exchanges that are the keystone of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. CITIZEN PETITION: Opposing Gov. Mark Dayton's "Exchange" Executive Order![]() I, the undersigned citizen, oppose Governor Dayton’s executive order to design and develop a Minnesota health insurance exchange because:
• Executive Order Bypasses the People’s Elected Representatives
• Exchange is a “Federal Takeover Center”
• Exchange will Enforce the Unconstitutional Mandate
Legislative Status of "State" Health Exchanges (Portals) - Updated 4/23/12![]() This diagram displays the number of states that have enacted state exchange (portal) laws under Obamacare, the number of states with operating exchanges (Mass/Utah), the number that have enacted bare bone laws that may be insufficient to establish an exchange, and the number of states that do not have any law (and often no plans) to establish a state exchange. |